Blog

Manufacturers don’t need a cybersecurity program built around buzzwords. They need technology that supports production, protects customer and company information, and helps them meet requirements without creating unnecessary disruption.

For many operations leaders, the hard question is: who should own the work.

Should you hire an internal IT or cybersecurity employee? Bring in an outside partner? Or combine both approaches?

There is no single right answer for every manufacturer. The best choice depends on your daily support needs, infrastructure, customer requirements, internal capabilities, budget, and the level of risk your organization is prepared to manage.

The goal is to choose a model that gives your business the right expertise and response capacity without adding more complexity than you need.

Why This Decision Is So Common In Manufacturing

Manufacturers often reach this decision because their technology needs have grown faster than the team responsible for managing them.

A plant may have started with a relatively simple environment: servers, workstations, business applications, and production systems. Over time, that environment becomes more complicated. New machines connect to the network. Cloud applications are added. Remote access becomes necessary. Customers begin asking cybersecurity questions. Insurance carriers introduce new requirements. Older systems remain in place because they still support production equipment.

At the same time, many manufacturers do not have a large internal IT department.

Technology responsibilities may instead fall to a plant manager, operations leader, controller, office manager, engineer, or another employee whose primary job is something else. That person becomes the default contact when a computer fails, a vendor needs access, a new employee starts, or a customer sends over a cybersecurity questionnaire.

That arrangement may work for a while. Eventually, however, the gap between what the business needs and what the internal team can reasonably support becomes too large.

Cybersecurity adds another layer. Protecting a manufacturing environment involves backups, access controls, software updates, remote connections, employee security awareness, threat monitoring, vendor access, incident response, and customer or contractual requirements.

When those responsibilities are spread across people who already have full-time jobs, important work can become reactive. Problems get addressed when they become urgent instead of being managed as part of a clear plan.

That is usually when leadership starts asking whether it’s time to hire internally or look for outside support.

When Hiring Internally Makes Sense

Hiring an internal IT professional can be the right move when your organization has enough consistent work to justify a dedicated role.

One of the clearest signs is high daily support volume. If employees constantly need help with devices, software, access, printers, connectivity, or production-related technology issues, having someone onsite can improve response time and reduce interruptions.

Internal hiring can also make sense when your infrastructure is unusually complex. A manufacturer with multiple facilities, specialized systems, extensive integrations, or a large number of production technologies may benefit from someone who understands the environment in detail and is available every day.

The same is true when technology plays a central role in long-term business strategy. If the company is planning major automation initiatives, systems modernization, acquisitions, new facilities, ERP changes, or other technology-heavy projects, an internal leader can provide valuable continuity.

But hiring internally only works well if leadership is prepared to manage the role effectively.

That means setting clear responsibilities, realistic priorities, adequate resources, and knowing when outside expertise is still necessary.

A common mistake is expecting one IT employee to handle everything: help desk requests, cybersecurity, infrastructure, strategic planning, compliance, vendor management, backups, cloud systems, and emergency response.

Even a capable internal employee has limits. They may be strong in networking but not cybersecurity. They may understand your ERP system but have limited experience with compliance requirements. They may know your environment extremely well but still need support when they are unavailable or multiple issues happen at once.

Hiring internally is often most successful when the business understands that one person does not automatically equal a complete IT and cybersecurity function.

When An Outside Partner Makes More Sense

An outside IT or cybersecurity partner can make sense when the organization needs expertise or coverage that would be difficult to build internally.

Strategic Advisement

Specialized knowledge is one of the biggest reasons manufacturers choose this route. A strong partner may bring experience across cybersecurity, infrastructure, cloud systems, compliance, backups, strategic planning, and support. Instead of relying on one person's background, the manufacturer gains access to a broader team.

That can be particularly valuable when there is an urgent requirement or deadline.

A customer may introduce new cybersecurity expectations as part of a contract. An insurance provider may require specific controls before renewing coverage. Leadership may need to address vulnerabilities identified during an assessment. A major systems project may need to happen before aging infrastructure creates a production risk.

In those situations, hiring and onboarding a new employee may take too long. An outside partner can often provide expertise more quickly.

Budget

Budget can also play a role.

Building a capable internal team usually involves more than one salary. A manufacturer may eventually need help desk support, infrastructure expertise, cybersecurity knowledge, strategic leadership, and coverage outside normal hours. Hiring separate employees for each function may not be practical for a small or midsized operation.

An outside provider can make broader capabilities available without requiring the company to build an entire department.

Perspective

Another advantage is perspective. A partner that works with multiple manufacturers may have seen similar legacy systems, customer requirements, and plant-floor challenges before, helping the organization evaluate options more quickly.

Of course, outsourcing is not automatically better. A provider that does not understand manufacturing may recommend changes that create unnecessary downtime. One that communicates only in technical language may make it difficult for leadership to understand why a project matters.

The decision is not simply whether to outsource. It’s whether the outside partner fits the way your business operates.

What Manufacturers Should Compare Beyond Cost

Cost matters, but it shouldn’t be the only factor.

The lowest-cost option can become expensive if problems take longer to resolve, projects create downtime, or important risks remain unaddressed.

Start with speed to value. How quickly can the person or provider begin improving your environment? An internal hire may need time to learn the systems, production priorities, network, and vendors. An outside partner may already have processes and specialists in place, but they still need to learn how your operation works.

Next, consider plant-floor understanding.

Manufacturing technology cannot always be treated like a standard office environment. Some systems may be old but essential. Certain machines may only work with specific software versions. Maintenance windows may be limited. Production schedules may make even a short interruption costly.

Whoever supports the environment needs to understand that “update everything immediately” is not always a practical answer.

Coverage and responsiveness are also important. Ask what happens when the main IT contact is unavailable. Who handles urgent issues? Is support available during your operating hours? What if a problem affects production early in the morning, late at night, or during a weekend shift?

Then look at the ability to support legacy environments.

Many manufacturers rely on older systems because replacing them may require expensive equipment upgrades or production changes. The right IT approach should balance security improvements with operational reality.

That may mean isolating older equipment, tightening access, improving backups, or adding monitoring rather than replacing every legacy system at once.

Finally, evaluate communication skills.

Operations leaders should not need a cybersecurity certification to understand what is happening.

A good internal employee or outside partner should be able to explain the business issue clearly: what could happen, what the options are, what each option costs, and how the decision could affect production, customers, or contracts.

Technical expertise matters. The ability to turn that expertise into practical business decisions matters just as much.

A Hybrid Model Many Manufacturers Prefer

For many manufacturers, the best answer is not purely internal or fully outsourced. It’s instead a hybrid model.

In this structure, the manufacturer keeps an internal point person who understands the business, while an outside partner provides additional expertise, capacity, and coverage.

The internal contact does not necessarily need to be a senior cybersecurity professional. Depending on the organization, the person may be an IT manager, systems administrator, operations leader, or another employee with responsibility for coordinating technology.

That person provides context. They know which production systems are most critical, which vendors need access, what projects are coming, and how leadership prefers to make decisions.

The outside partner adds depth. They can provide cybersecurity specialists, project resources, help desk support, infrastructure expertise, strategic guidance, monitoring, or other capabilities the internal team does not have.

This model can also create clearer roles.

Routine employee support might go to the outside help desk. The internal contact may coordinate plant-specific issues and vendor relationships. The partner may manage cybersecurity tools, backups, infrastructure, and assessments. Strategic planning can happen jointly.

Projects can be assigned based on expertise rather than whoever happens to have time.

The same approach works for compliance and customer requirements. The internal person can gather business information and communicate with leadership, while the outside partner helps translate technical requirements into specific actions.

That division of responsibility can make technology more manageable and reduce dependence on any one person.

If the internal contact leaves, the outside partner still has documentation and familiarity with the environment. If the provider needs a specialist, the internal contact still represents the manufacturer's priorities.

Choosing The Right Model For Your Operation

The internal-versus-outsourced decision should not start with a job description or a vendor proposal. It should start with the work your business actually needs done.

Look at the volume of daily support requests. Consider the complexity of your infrastructure. Identify upcoming customer, insurance, or compliance requirements. Review major projects on the horizon. Think about how quickly someone needs to respond when production is affected.

Then ask a simple question: what combination of people and expertise can handle those responsibilities reliably?

For some manufacturers, that will justify building a stronger internal team. For others, an outside partner will provide the breadth and speed they need. And for many, the strongest model will combine an internal point person with external specialists.

The goal of a manufacturer’s IT function is to create a practical support model that protects uptime, helps the company meet requirements, and gives leadership confidence that technology issues are being handled before they become business problems.

Not Sure Which IT Approach Makes Sense?

You may know you need help without knowing whether the right answer is to handle the issue internally, bring in help for a specific project, or build an ongoing relationship with an outside IT partner.

Our free Manufacturing IT Options Comparison Guide: Internal Fix, One-Time Project, or Ongoing Partner? breaks down the differences so you can compare each approach based on your needs, resources, production risks, and long-term goals.

Download the free comparison guide to find the most practical path for your operation without overcomplicating the decision.